119 = =2009/1/20 21:29:00
122 = =2009/1/20 21:43:00
125 ==2009/1/20 21:57:00
＝＝＝＝
You are making people laugh, for real.
'A lot of people' should be followed by 'are' instead of 'is', 'were' instead of 'was'
your sentence structure is also too segmented. Phrases shall not be only linked by plain comma, especially in the case of a ?gerund phrase.
The first sentence could be RE-corrected like this
"A lot of people have been accusing the Johnnys idol Ryo Nishikido of plagiarism in music."
Pay tell, what makes you so proud of your English background to level of 'correcting' others?
129 = =2009/1/20 22:53:00
= =2009-1-20 21:29:00
a lot of people told that the idol who come from johnnys' RYO nishikido copy the music~
what about your thinking??
==========================
纯粹指出语法错误:
A lot of people was told that the idol who comes from Johnnys', Ryo Nishikido, plagiarizing music from others~ What do you think?
OR
A lot of people is talking about Ryo Nishikido, idol from Johnny's, plagiarzing music from others~ What do you think?
------------------------
其实不用这么大改动
tell及物用法也算的过去，虽然看着有点别扭，但是语法上没有错。只是时态错了，既然前面是told，后面就应该是copied，不一定要用plagiarize
至于What about your thinking，语法上来说也是可以的，thinking作为名词想法，在这里是可以说得通的
所以说，把copy改成copied，这个句子虽然怪里怪气了点，但是也是正确的
＝＝＝＝
You are making people laugh, for real.
'A lot of people' should be followed by 'are' instead of 'is', 'were' instead of 'was'
your sentence structure is also too segmented. Phrases shall not be only linked by plain comma, especially in the case of a ?gerund phrase.
The first sentence could be RE-corrected like this
"A lot of people have been accusing the Johnnys idol Ryo Nishikido of plagiarism in music."
Pay tell, what makes you so proud of your English background to level of 'correcting' others?
=========================
BOLD LETTERS.
I can't agree with you anymore.
Maybe she is being bold. But sometims you don't need to sound so superviosr alike.
We are not Mr. know-all anyway.